Notice:if have any questions about the law ,you can be found on our website related lawyer to answer you.Last month,the attorneys at lawyers-in-usa.com helped millions of people make smarter, more confident legal decisions.

PlacentiaCalifornia(CA) Levine, Maureen Hatchell personal infomation and areas of practice

California Placentia Law Offices of Kennith L. Peterson attorney Levine, Maureen Hatchell
  • Lawyer name:Levine, Maureen Hatchell
  • Address:949 E. Yorba Linda Blvd. Placentia,CA
  • Phone:800-886-9796
  • Fax:714-572-1671
  • PostalCode:92870 -3644
  • WebSite:http://www.klplaw.com/
  • Areas of Practice:Aviation

California PlacentiaLaw Offices of Kennith L. Peterson attorney Levine, Maureen Hatchell is a Very good lawyer practice area in Aviation,Law Offices of Kennith L. Peterson

if you have any problem in Aviation,please email to Law Offices of Kennith L. Peterson or call 800-886-9796 or Go to our company directly(addr:949 E. Yorba Linda Blvd. Placentia,CA) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

  • Maureen Levine has devoted most of her 30 years in the legal field to the practice of real estate law. Maureen started her career as a law clerk in 1979, gaining unusually extensive experience in the law both before and during law school, prior to becoming an attorney in 1984. Maureen researched and drafted hundreds of complaints, motions, requests for injunctive relief, extraordinary writs, and appellate briefs in the California Courts of Appeal and Supreme Court, and in the federal appellate courts, through the entire appellate process. This work included briefing and all procedures representing the rights of property owners in the U.S. Supreme Court in the high-profile, precedent-setting, assumable loan “due-on-sale” case, Fidelity Federal S & L Ass’n v. de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141 (1982), which involved pivotal constitutional preemption issues.

    Continuing her work in the law, during law school and after passing the bar in 1984, Maureen worked in various business litigation matters, including trade secret litigation, employment and labor law matters, legal malpractice, and various real estate cases, ultimately focusing her practice primarily on the representation of manufactured housing owners (mobilehome park owners). Her work in this field has covered diverse issues in landlord-tenant law, including high stakes, multi-party premises liability (“failure-to-maintain”) lawsuits, ground lease issues and mobilehome park closures, unlawful detainers, rent control, management issues, park development, as well as the drafting of residency documents (leases and rules/regulations), and the defense of Fair Housing and other discrimination claims.

    Maureen has always maintained diverse experience in other areas of the law, ranging from labor disputes, general landlord-tenant matters, habitability issues, real estate sale disputes, workers’ compensation defense, insurance bad-faith litigation, land use, construction contractor litigation, to the drafting of contracts and other legal documents, and some basic bankruptcy and anti-trust matters. In all of this legal work, Maureen has conducted hundreds of depositions and countless trials. She prides herself in combining ethics and professionalism with aggressive and zealous representation. Maureen also assists clients by advising them on the legal aspects of their day-to-day business operations.

    During her career, Maureen has participated in other precedent-setting appellate cases, successfully fighting for the interests of property owners in the high-profile cases, Panko v. Pan American S & L Ass’n (1981) 119 Cal. App. 3d 916, vacated 458 U. S. 117; Dawn v. Superior Court (1982) 30 Cal. 3d 695; Garber v. Fullerton S & L Ass’n (1981) 122 Cal. App. 3d 423; as well as successfully representing the school district in another high-profile case involving constitutional challenges to medical fee regulation in Ameri-Medical Corporation v. W.C.A.B. (Rhooms) (1996) 42 Cal. App. 4th 1260. She also worked with the team representing the property owners in rent control challenges in Carson Mobilehome Park Owners Ass’n v. City of Carson (1983) 35 Cal. 3d 184 and Oceanside Mobilehome Park Owners’ Ass’n v. City of Oceanside (1985) 157 Cal. App. 3d 887.

    Maureen has been a member of the California State Bar since 1984, authorized to practice in all courts throughout the State of California. Maureen is also a member of and authorized to practice in all federal courts in the State of California, the Northern, Eastern, Southern and Central U. S. District Courts, and the Ninth Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals. Maureen has taught the subject Trusts at her Alma Mater, Western State University College of Law and received various awards in law school, graduating sixth in her class of one hundred twelve. She majored in Russian language, history, and literature in her undergraduate studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

  • California, 1984

Law Offices of Kennith L. Peterson & Joy Attorneys

Placentia California lawyer Levine, Maureen Hatchell Placentia California lawyer Peterson, Kennith L. Placentia California lawyer Terhufen, Kellie Leigh

lawyer Levine, Maureen Hatchell Reviews

Question regarding Power Of Attorney?

."?. . Do you see what I mean? Maybe the banks are reading exactly what powers you have but you are generalizing.. . Maybe the Power of Attorney states "My attorney-in-fact (agent) has the power to sue anyone as I might personally sue as my agent solely deems fit, for any reason my agent solely deems, using any attorney-at-law in any court of law, using all my money at my agent's sole discretion.". . Does it say something like that? I guess you can see by now what we need in order to answer your question.. . General answer is Banks or anyone do not have to honor a power of attorney. But, courts generally honor the power of attorney so that means you can sue banks for not honoring the power of attorney. However, at this point you will definitely need an attorney-at-law!

Is it good to do this?. I had an employer just for 4 days.. I had to quit because I didn't want to work without any official forms there as their habbit used to be.... Now I am going to an interview for a volunteering position in Clinical Research but I already declared that position.... What should I do now?. Should I tell the truth If they ask me?. Are they going to call and check with my former "employer"?. I know for sure that my employer is going to deny this because well she is not stupid.... I shouldn't have started without any contract or legal agreements I know...but this was supposed to be my first job in US and I couldn't believe things like this happen here!!!. What do you think?. Any advice?. . I have to make the following mention:. I am a permanent rezident!!! I am not on a work visa.. That is why I was totally blown away when I realised that the employer wanted me to work like this...without contract and also being paid with personal checks....

I live in ny state and I have recently gotten married and moved out of my parents house having to leave behind my dog. I got my dog when I was 13 and threw the years he has helped me with my depression and anxiety. he has always been there for me and we have a really close bond. as we have been separated iv noticed my depressions gotten worst and my parents mention that he seems depressed too, he will wait up at night waiting for me to come home even though I haven't been home in weeks. . I read in my apartment lease that service dogs are allowed and I have heard about dogs being certified as service dogs for people who have bad depression and was wonder if this might apply in my case, and how I can get him certified.. maybe I didn't make my self clear earlier, I do suffer with server depression, i have ever since a young age. I have tried drugs and doctors but they don't work, I have found that being with my dog has helped. to me he is not just a pet, he is way more. so i am not trying to "rip off the legal service dogs" or scam anyone. my depressions gotten really bad again and now the only thing to resort to is drugs that make me feel like a zombie and i have a life now i cant be zombiefied. so please don't think that i have bad intention, i meant this with all good intentions..

In that Utilities and Insurance companies both have LEGISLATED PROFITS(ie,they cannot lose money and base thier rates on a "cost plus" system of accounting),do you favor mandatory government backed health care coverage?.

*Need to make sure you have what happens when they want to get rid of you or you don't want to work for them anymore. It is best to include that both parties give a 2 week notice. . There are really a lot of things to remember when dealing with a nanny contract. I learned the hard way with a contract that was written in a VERY ambiguous way.

this is the lawyers reviews
Lawyers bottom relation content