Notice:if have any questions about the law ,you can be found on our website related lawyer to answer you.Last month,the attorneys at lawyers-in-usa.com helped millions of people make smarter, more confident legal decisions.

New YorkNew York(NY) Lief, Jason A. personal infomation and areas of practice

New York New York Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP attorney Lief, Jason A.
  • Lawyer name:Lief, Jason A.
  • Address:745 Fifth Avenue New York,NY
  • Phone:(212) 588-0800
  • Fax:(212) 588-0500
  • PostalCode:10151
  • WebSite:http://pview.findlaw.com/view/
  • Areas of Practice:Antitrust FDA/Regulatory Licensing and Transactions Litigation Patent Prosecution Trademarks &

New York New YorkFrommer Lawrence & Haug LLP attorney Lief, Jason A. is a Very good lawyer practice area in Antitrust FDA/Regulatory Licensing and Transactions Litigation Patent Prosecution Trademarks & Copyrights ,Licensing, Regulatory Enforcement, Antitrust Law, Transactions, Regulatory Compliance & Auditing, Copyrights, Trademarks, Litigation & Appeals, Patents,Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP

if you have any problem in Copyrights ,Licensing, Regulatory Enforcement, Antitrust Law, Transactions, Regulatory Compliance & Auditing, Copyrights, Trademarks, Litigation & Appeals, Patents,please email to Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP or call (212) 588-0800 or Go to our company directly(addr:745 Fifth Avenue New York,NY) ,we will provide free legal advice for you.

  • Jason A.?Lief is a partner in the New York office of Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP, where his practice focuses on patent and intellectual property litigation and counseling. Mr. Lief has successfully represented clients in several dozen major patent litigations, including Hatch-Waxman cases involving billion-dollar pharmaceutical products and matters concerning other cutting-edge technologies. Mr. Lief has tried patent infringement, validity and enforceability issues before United States federal judges and juries; has argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and has managed and conducted all aspects of discovery, including foreign court appearances pursuant to the Hague Convention. Mr. Lief has litigated, as lead counsel or counsel, on behalf of GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Merck and Unilever, amongst others. Mr. Lief’s practice also involves opinion work, counseling and due diligence regarding a variety of patent and intellectual property concerns. He is a frequent speaker on patent law developments. Mr. Lief’s matters have spanned the technologies of organic chemistry, biotechnology, antibodies, combinatorial chemistry, RNAi technology, antibiotics, anti-depressants, anti-retroviral and anti-ulcer medicines, sustained-release medicines, drug-stabilization, polymers, advanced battery systems, detergents and deodorant technologies. Among his accomplishments, Mr. Lief has: Tried and upheld the validity and enforceability of a patent covering a major antibiotic medication on behalf of one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies. Successfully enforced and settled, as lead counsel, a series of patent litigations involving nutraceutical health-supplements. Crafted the winning cross-examination that revealed the opposing expert’s "monstrous error" of chemistry in a Hatch-Waxman patent case involving one of the world’s best-selling anti-ulcer medications. Argued successfully for the exclusion of opposing counsel in a patent litigation involving a blockbuster anti-depressant. Briefed the successful appeal of a patent case involving a blockbuster sustained-release anti-depressant medicine. Forced a generic defendant to stipulate to infringement of a patent covering a blockbuster anti-depressant. Maintained a patent / licensing dispute in federal court over federal-question jurisdiction and Eleventh Amendment objections. Obtained pivotal Hague Convention testimony in Australia and France in two separate patent litigations. Successfully settled a design patent case in the jewelry field. Stayed a trade secret litigation in favor of arbitration on behalf of one of the world’s largest consumer products companies. Successfully argued for the dismissal of various state law claims as preempted by federal copyright law in a copyright dispute between two jewelry companies. Participated in the successful settlement of several major patent disputes between two of the world’s largest consumer products companies. Representative reported cases include: Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 344 F.3d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Andrx Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, 236 F.R.D. 583 (S.D. Fla. 2006), aff’d., 2006 WL 2403942 (S.D. Fla. 2006); Eyal R.D. Corp. v. Jewelex New York Ltd., 784 F.Supp.2d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2011); Concat LP v. Unilever, PLC, 350 F.Supp.2d 796 (N.D. Cal. 2004); Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Pharmadyne Corp., 32 F.Supp.2d 265 (D.Md. 1998); University of Minnesota v. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., 58 F.Supp.2d 1036 (D. Minn. 1999) and 44 F.Supp.2d 998 (D. Minn. 1999); Glaxo Group Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc., 130 F.Supp.2d 1006 (N.D. Ill. 2001); Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Ben Venue Labs., 1998 WL 965993 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 31, 1998); and Pfizer, Inc. v. Perrigo Co., 988 F.Supp. 686 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). While in law school, Mr. Lief was the Notes Editor for the Cardozo Law Review. In addition, Jason holds a degree in Chemistry and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa as an undergraduate. Mr. Lief is admitted to practice in the state of New York, the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in the United States Supreme Court.

  • New York U.S. District Court Southern District of New York U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit U.S. Supreme Court Colorado

  • Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, New York, New York, 1995 Brooklyn College, 1987B.A., Bachelor of Arts

  • Frommer Lawrence & Haug is a leading intellectual property law firm with proven expertise in transactional, regulatory, and antitrust law. With substantial counseling and negotiating expertise, FLH’s exceptional talent pool offers clients strategic, creative, multidisciplinary solutions to their legal issues and business problems. Many of the firm’s 73 attorneys have advanced degrees in scientific and technical disciplines, and work with a team of highly-trained scientific advisors.

    With offices in New York City, Washington DC, Seattle, and Tokyo, FLH’s lawyers address?matters in virtually every jurisdiction throughout the world.? They try cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, U.S. Federal Courts, Court of Federal Claims, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. International Trade Commission, and the Patent Offices of Europe, Australia, Hong Kong and Japan, to name a few. The firm counsels Fortune 500 companies, growth enterprises, and individuals in all areas of intellectual property law, and uncovers unique approaches to U.S. and foreign litigations, particularly in the fields of electronics, pharmaceuticals, chemistry, biotechnology, mechanical engineering, e-commerce, trademarks, trade secrets and FDA.

    FLH seeks, first and foremost, to craft legal strategies that make business sense for its clients. Creating, managing and analyzing portfolios with an eye on a client’s financial goals is one of the firm’s founding principles. This entails fully understanding a client’s business?their products, processes, and services?leveraging existing technologies, and exposing unforeseen opportunities to achieve long-term success.

    FLH’s attorneys are skilled architects of legal solutions with a stellar track record in defending against patents, enforcing intellectual property assets, exploiting possibilities within complex federal regulations and navigating the delicate balance between exclusive rights and antitrust concerns.

    FLH is committed to its tradition of innovation, excellence, and integrity. It builds its relationships based on open communication, ready access, and immediate responsiveness. And, it tailors strategies that yield measurable and significant results for clients.?

    ?

Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP & Joy Attorneys

New York lawyer Fanelli, Laura New York lawyer Berkin, Ali Ph.D. New York lawyer Amundson, Steven M. New York lawyer Berkin, Ali Ph.D. New York New York lawyer Chen, Angus Ph.D. New York New York lawyer Chubb, Laura A. New York New York lawyer Dach, Benjamin I New York New York lawyer DeRosa, Frank J. New York New York lawyer Desai, Sam New York New York lawyer Ehrhard, Kathleen N. Ph.D. New York New York lawyer Fleming, Porter F. New York lawyer Franks, Vicki New York New York lawyer Garman, Russell A. Ph.D. New York lawyer Franks, Vicki New York New York lawyer Frommer, William S. New York New York lawyer Giove, Nicholas F. New York New York lawyer Goncalves, Brian S. New York New York lawyer Harkness, Michael New York New York lawyer Haug, Edgar H. New York New York lawyer Herman, David New York New York lawyer Kanter, Jason New York New York lawyer Lawrence, William F. New York New York lawyer Lawrence, Erin A. New York New York lawyer LeDonne, Eugene New York New York lawyer Levy, Paul A. New York New York lawyer Lief, Jason A. New York New York lawyer Lieb, Stephen J. New York New York lawyer McClure, Rachael New York New York lawyer Parke, Richard E. New York New York lawyer Raubicheck, Charles J. New York New York lawyer Patterson, Jeffrey D. New York New York lawyer Roberts, Stephanie M New York New York lawyer Samay, Christian E. New York New York lawyer Taylor, John G. New York New York lawyer Santucci, Ronald R. New York New York lawyer Saphia, Joseph V. New York New York lawyer Treloar, Joseph W. New York New York lawyer Selli, Erika V. New York New York lawyer Wang, John Ph.D. New York New York lawyer Weinhouse, Deena Levy New York New York lawyer White, Barry S. New York New York lawyer Zhang, Fangyan New York New York lawyer Zwally, David A.

lawyer Lief, Jason A. Reviews

Litigation

Litigation

Microsoft Access Question!!!?

Can a power of attnorey form be valid even without a sigurture in Wisconsin?

It gets confusing, but some health insurance companies are already allowing adult children to stay on parents? plans after age 18, while others are making adult children wait until the next annual renewal period after September 23, 2010, which may occur (for example) at the beginning of 2011. Ask your parents to contact their Human Resources department or benefits administrator to learn more how they will implement this rule.

It would be advisable that you assure that your records are in order before I am forced to take legal action. This is an attempt to correct your records, any information obtained shall be used for that purpose.. . Best Regards,. . Your Signature. Your Name

how do i delete drafts?

My goal is to make sure I'm covered for broadcasting so I want to have a form which people sign allowing me to use their image.. What is it called? And what should it look like?.

this is the lawyers reviews
Lawyers bottom relation content